Guilty of Dysconscious Linguicism Part II
Posted by ShelApr 10
Hello! Now that I’ve made my confession re: dysconscious linguicism in my previous vlog, I will discuss what linguicism and dysconscious linguicism are. They are kind of complex concepts, so I will attempt to simplify them and keep this post short and sweet.
What is it?
It’s a form of prejudice that involves an individual making judgments about another’s wealth, education, social status, etc, based on the other’s choice and use of language. (Wikipedia)
It’s a form of prejudice, an “-ism” , along the lines of racism, ageism, sexism, classism and audism. (Wikipedia)
This concept is best described in this way:
SCENARIOS:
Two persons are talking. During the course of this conversation, one of the persons is assessing the other’s wealth, quality of education, status in society based on the other person’s use/choice of language or dialect.
A) If the other person shows an excellent command of English, the assessor assumes he is quite well-educated, possibly from a wealthy family, which then indicates an elevated status in society.
B) If that other person shows poor command of the English language, or uses another language, the assessor assumes that he’s ill-educated, poor, possibly from a ghetto and therefore from the lower classes in society.
The scenarios described above is linguicism, pure and simple. How does linguicism as described above apply to the Deaf?
A) When a Deaf person is able to speak English with his voice, or write excellent English, he gets lauded as intelligent and well educated. This person is considered successful in life.
B) When a Deaf uses ASL (no matter how fluently), but writes mediocre English, and cannot speak English, he is considered intellectually inferior, ill-educated, and guaranteed to fail in life.
This judgement is blatant linguicism. What is worse, we internalize this attitude and apply it to our own people!
DYSCONSCIOUS LINGUICISM:
What is it?
I will use the terms of racism and audism to aid in understanding the term dysconscious linguicism.
A form of racism that accepts dominant white norms and privileges. (Pewewardy)
If one is Black, Aboriginal, or other, one allocates a high degree of respect to the dominant White majority at the expense of one’s esteem of one’s own racial group. This individual desires to “be as White as possible” and renounce his own racial heritage and norms. (Pewewardy describes it another way: If you have seen these racial antics and negative behaviours … for most of your life, you may become absolutely numb to it.)
A form of audism that accepts dominant hearing norms and privileges. It is the attitude of a Deaf individual that Hearing people are better than Deaf people. ” To hear is better than to be deaf.” It is the desire to be as Hearing as possible. I will apply Pewewardy’s explanation here: If you have seen (audist) antics and negative behaviours for most of your life, you may become absolutely numb to it.)
DYSCONSCIOUS LINGUICISM:
(The definition is similar to dysconscious racism and dysconscious audism.)
A form of linguicism that accepts the dominant language as superior to own minority language.
It is the attitude that English is superior to ASL (or Spanish, or other… insert language here).
Remember my previous vlog that described my perception of ASL as broken English, and how the ASL-using Deaf weren’t smart and required support because they had low-quality education? Well, that was an excellent example of dysconscious linguicism, When we have dysconscious linguicism in the Deaf community, that usually comes hand in hand with dysconscious audism. You might recall the hard of hearing students in the last vlog who thought they were privileged to go to public schools because they could hear and speak better than the rest of us? Those same students also viewed ASL as broken English!
19 comments
Comment by MM on April 11, 2010 at 4:59 am
I think some take deafness far too seriously in Canada ! I thought we had cured the Americans of their obsessions with their navel, now to find Canadians have caught the bug too. Even Paddy Ladd knows the Brits rejected all this day one…. Perhaps we are living our lives instead of thinking everyone is out to get us….. There is so much unhappiness, negativity associated with deafhood, audisms and the terminology, we’re better off disassociating deaf people from it all. Where is the community spirit ? surely none of them are thinking of making up new terms 24/7 and running ‘deafhood’ workshops ? I find it all very depressing. It is like some ‘collective’
Comment by Shel on April 11, 2010 at 8:00 am
MM, please read Dianrez’s comment in Part I of this series, and you will see it is not about viewing the world as being out to get us. The linguicism, dysconscious or other, along with racism, sexism, etc are occurring with other minority groups, not just the Deaf. Perhaps you should be reading up on material written by Dr. Tove Skutnabb-Kangas before dismissing the issues raised as mere obsessions. Go to Tove Skutnabb-Kangas’ homepage. Just google it, and click on the links I have posted.
Comment by Shel on April 11, 2010 at 9:18 am
MM, there is much to be said for an open mind. Before you dismiss our concerns about linguicism and dysconscious linguicism, you should look to your own Welsh history of linguicism and linguistic imperialism by the English. I bring your attention to this link. Scroll down to the Welsh section.
I also bring your attention to another piece of information on the suppression of the Welsh language, otherwise known as linguicism against the Welsh language. Now, I challenge you to open your mind re: linguicism against ASL, especially in education in North America, and yes, against BSL in the United Kingdom in favour of spoken English.
Comment by DeafChip on April 11, 2010 at 10:13 am
Hi Shel,
Well said. When I saw MM’s comment, I knew he would do something. Depressing, in fact, does not associate with us. All I know is that his ignorance still owns him!
Comment by Don G on April 11, 2010 at 1:55 pm
Oh MM….
When will you learn? You haven’t cured us of anything, navel-gazing or otherwise.
We’re not making up these terms. They are out there, in other minority communities. As Shel pointed out, Tove Skutnabb-Kangaas has written about linguicism long before we Deaf even knew of the word. Racism, sexism, have existed, now we use audism to point to a Deaf-specific instance of oppression (as racism, sexism, etc. Are).
The only unhappiness associated with these terms should be from those people who embrace and desire, or benefit from the oppression oof others. We use these terms to liberate our community from this oppression. If Deaf people are unhappy with these terms, it is because they have embraced the oppression for themselves, and do not want to see any change in their situation (possibly because they benefit from it somehow?).
If these terms upset and depress you, maybe you should look inside yourself and see if it is possible that you yourself benefit from the oppression exemplified by audism and linguicism and if so, think upon whether that is truly healthy for yourself and the Deaf community that I know you do care about.
Comment by Candy on April 11, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Examples you provided, your own? I have seen examples of linguicisms which does not even compare to yours. It’s one thing to be sincere and another to exaggerate. Even Nikki Acknowledged her intentions with her vlogs. Go and check her latest comment in one of her vlogs. As much as I had suspected, she acknowledged that what signs we use is up to us and our business but when you challenge ASL instructors (whom have experience) and disregard them and the ASL signs IN AN ASL CLASSROOM, then it is what it is.
How about delving more into all the wonderful things that makes up ASL and the deaf culture rather than finding words that divides. You guys amaze me. *chuckles*
Comment by MM on April 11, 2010 at 2:39 pm
Don you yourself put out a blog refuting such a term as dysconcious ever existed, indeed I agree I cannot find it either in any dictionary (Nor Audism for that matter). For 3 years I have read just about all I can on what deaf feel about this and the endless arguments it has created, even you have dedicated entire blogs to the arguments that have ensued, I can recall when we didn’t have this division and disunity that has since merged.
There is no need and never has been for cultural deaf to line up against other deaf or HI, provoke angst with ‘cyborgs’ and whatever, but that is end result of it. Many have seized upon deafhood as a weapon of ‘payback’, Mr Ladd NEVER meant that to happen, nor for deaf people to live in the past. That IS History.
If you want a debate have one, not ‘them against us’, which is all I am reading. Don left deaf.read because most deaf were simply not interested in the constant diatribe ‘deafhood’ was creating. If the point of deafhood is unity, it is an total failure. If it is self-appreciation of ID, then it just is looking like validating isolation to most. Do you and Shel want debate ? or just someone that will agree with you ?
It is all to easy to rubbish an oppositional view, but does it help understanding at all ? You KNOW British have rejected deafhood, I posted an Mr Ladd interview where he acknowledged it in person, do not shoot the messenger because you don’t like the message. I’ve been deaf as long as some here have been alive, I have a right to a view.
Comment by Shel on April 11, 2010 at 2:52 pm
Dysconscious as a term definitely exists! Here’s the link. I found this by accident the other day. To my understanding, it was first coined in 1991. I believe you guys will find this information interesting. In Ridley’s book it has to do with racism, but is applicable to audism, regardless of whether you believe this or not.
Comment by MM on April 11, 2010 at 4:26 pm
‘Linguicism’ that term exists, ‘Dysconcious’ did not…. While ANY term can become ‘colloquial’ it is not necessary valid as a dictionary term, without an ‘official’ and accepted description of what it means. It goes before a ‘panel’ or board they decide, asI Understand. You are linking a non-validated word with a valid one. It can only be applicable to Audism if THAT word is in a dictionary again, many dictionaries do not contain that word either. 9 out of 10 searches (10 on my computer), brought up ‘autism’. Wiki is invalid in most cases… and as again I listed on another b;log I putt up a while ago, refused Audism because there was no official validation from anywhere. When you have terminology that is legitimised, it may be easier to put a view forward..
It is difficult to argue a term or case, when there are no official recognitions of it.
Comment by Shel on April 11, 2010 at 4:41 pm
Simply because a term isn’t in the dictionary doesn’t mean it is in any way invalid as a term. Racism was coined and used for 30+ years before it was finally put in a dictionary. It doesn’t mean racism didn’t exist for that 30+ years before it was in a dictionary. It wasn’t in limbo. It was a serious reality for those who experienced racism. The same applies to audism.
dysconscious (the link I showed you was from a book, NOT Wikipedia) is indeed a valid term. Perhaps you should check that link I posted in an earlier comment to you in response to your response to Don G.
Just because there is no official recognition of a term doesn’t mean the phenomenon doesn’t exist.
Comment by the one and only ridor on April 11, 2010 at 5:25 pm
Again, MM, you do not REPRESENT the Deaf UKs. I have tons of Deaf friends living in England and they knew who you are — they disparaged you repeatedly in the past. They also indicated that the main reason why you went online to harass Deaf people on the other side of Atlantic Ocean is because your words do not get across to anyone else in UK!!
Many Deaf Brits already recognized the concept of Deafhood — why do you think they protested to the government to include BSL as an official language in UK?! The bottom line is that you are not being heard nor read in UK, you had to harass someone else somewhere else.
Again, DeafRead is pretty limited to certain few. Which is why DeafRead & DVTV are *dead* these days with less-than-quality vlogs/blogs.
Audism exists. Autism was a term that did not come in the picture in early 1900s! And your point is? The truth is that you … are afraid of the inconvenient truth.
R-
Comment by Dianrez on April 11, 2010 at 10:23 pm
People who resist new words are actually resisting recognition of the concepts they were coined to describe.
Dysconscious may not be a dictionary word yet, but unconscious is. If you like this word better, then use it instead of quibbling. We need to recognize what it means. Same for audism, if you don’t like that word, then use oppression. The concept is still there, as ugly and it needs to be dealt with.
Picking on the semantics is a tired old way to sweep things under the carpet.
Comment by Shel on April 11, 2010 at 10:45 pm
Dianrez, that is an interesting viewpoint. ” People who resist new words are actually resisting recognition of the concepts they were coined to describe.” This makes sense. If people are actually resisting recognition of the concepts per se, then it won’t matter what terms are chosen if they resist the concepts per se, would it? I think some people actually RESIST the concepts themselves more than the terms.
I wouldn’t say unconscious, but subconscious would be a better choice to describe what’s happening.
Yeah, I know semantics, semantics. But your suggestion for oppression as a term to be used… well, oppression is such a broad term, and we need to get specific if we are to change the status quo. Martin Luther King could have cried OPPRESSION instead of RACISM. But it was RACISM that was raised. Oppression encompasses so many types of behaviours, and it is easier to ignore specifics.
But, you’re correct: quibbling is one way of sweeping things under the carpet. There are those who will remove the carpet, and examine issues. I think that is the way things have always been since recorded history. There are people who prefer to keep the status quo and refuse to examine issues, while there are others who confront issues head-on and press for changes for the better. This shakes people out of their comfort zone for sure.
Comment by Deafchip on April 11, 2010 at 11:08 pm
I have no idea how they have denied the reality of audism and linguicism. I am not sure how they think that way even though they know audism and linguicism do exist.
When we share our experiences and yet, they criticize our experiences. Yes there is something wrong with the picture. I can’t fathom their mystified attitudes and preplexed views.
Comment by Don G. on April 11, 2010 at 11:22 pm
MM — PLEASE point me to the v/blog in which I “refuted” the existence of the term dysconscious! If I ever did that, then I need to either take it off or clarify my words.
I suspect that you will actually be UNABLE to find any such v/blog.
Comment by Candy on April 11, 2010 at 11:51 pm
This is what Nikki said: yep, the notion that one is automatically guilty of audism because of linguicism is absurd. The purpose of my original vlog is to provoke and it DID!
Good reason why any isms should be avoided. You can try to discuss this issue without getting into all that isms. It is not getting anyone anywhere. Nikki originally did this linguicism series in response to a sign that an ASL student used which this student also challenged her on. In no way was she using it between deaf.
Keep things simple. If you felt you have been oppressed, say oppressed. This will more likely garner more discussion that might enlighten people rather than offend and who knows..you might get more out of it this way.
Comment by MM on April 12, 2010 at 4:05 am
I understand it was via a comment on one of Shel’s blog, I will look it up again. There was no claim at all that I represent an UK overall view, I represent my own view as an UK deaf person, and have never suggested otherwise. My blog is the last word on that. As regards to the terminology, I cannot accept what doesn’t exist, it’s not a matter of denial. I accept discrimination does only a fool says differently, but that is what it is, discrimination.
I don’t feel a need for an alternative word for it and most don’t. I’ve been attacked for being deaf, it’s been on record and on UK police files too. This is what annoys many at deaf.read the suggestion if you don’t agree with something then YOU are some ‘audist’ or other, or ‘hate’ deaf people, or….. fascism started much the same way in Germany.
Today deafhood has spawned a form of ‘terminological fascism’, and yes, both terms exist in a dictionary. I’m none too sure deafhood actually does either. It probably won’t be for a while because clearly you are still debating what it is… I’m wondering who is in denial here….
Comment by cna training on May 1, 2010 at 11:19 pm
found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later
Pingback by Deaf Village on September 1, 2010 at 5:11 pm
[...] was it to try and appear more “intelligent” and more “educated” hoping that linguicism would prevail on the part of the committee looking favorably at Tim’s pleas and be impressed [...]